The Pain of Confessing When You Cannot Have Someon



Love is one of the most beautiful feelings in life. But sometimes, it can also be the most painful. Falling in love with someone, feeling something special for them, is magical. You carry that feeling in your heart and it becomes a part of you.

But what happens when you love someone deeply, someone you cannot have, someone you cannot make yours? Life does not always allow us to be with the person we love. And in such moments, confessing your feelings can become a painful choice.

When you tell that person everything—your feelings, your thoughts, your heart—you feel relief at first. You think you are being honest and true to yourself. But later, when life does not let you be with them, that confession can turn into your biggest regret. You keep thinking, Why did I say everything? Why did I open my heart when I could not have them?

It is a strange kind of pain. You have already shared your emotions, but you cannot take the next step. You cannot hold them, you cannot include them in your life, and you cannot change the circumstances. The love that once felt light and beautiful now feels heavy and full of regret.

Sometimes, it is better to keep your feelings inside. To silently cherish the love you feel without speaking it, especially when you know you cannot be with that person. Silent love may feel lonely, but it protects your heart from the deepest regret—the regret of confessing when life does not allow you to have your beloved.

In life, timing matters. Love at the wrong time can become a source of pain. Confession is beautiful when it is possible to act on it, but when it is impossible, silence can be the safest choice.

Love is not always about possession. Sometimes, it is about feeling, remembering, and quietly holding someone in your heart—even if they can never be yours.

Thoughts / Syed Azam Ali Shah

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How Napoleon and Others Used Books to Understand the East

Image
In history, Western leaders like Napoleon saw the East (or Orient) through books and ideas shaped by "Orientalism." Orientalism is a way of thinking about the East that often simplifies and misrepresents it. People like Napoleon and others who followed this tradition believed what these books said about the Orient and used them to guide their actions without actually knowing or understanding the people of the region. Books vs. Real Life: When people only rely on books or written information, they miss the complexity of real life. A book might say that all lions are fierce, and if someone encounters one fierce lion, they’ll believe that all lions are exactly like that. If the book also says how to handle a fierce lion and this advice works, people will trust that author even more and might even rely on them for more "knowledge" about lions. Over time, more books will repeat this idea of fierce lions, creating a belief that doesn’t leave room for other views. This hap...
Read more

Understanding Orientalism in Simple Words

Image
Introduction: Orientalism is a way that Western (European and American) scholars and writers have looked at the East, which includes countries like Egypt, India, China, and the Arab world. But Orientalism is not just an innocent study of the East. It often comes with stereotypes, or fixed ideas, that make people from the East look strange, exotic, or backward. In this blog, we’ll look at some simple ideas from Orientalism and why they matter. What Orientalism Thinks of the East: Orientalism has a habit of turning people from the East into characters, like they are in a story. It often shows them as if they are all the same, without any individuality. For example, some Orientalists see all Arabs as "camel-riding, terroristic, or too rich without any hard work." They make it seem like Eastern people do not understand self-government or progress, like they cannot govern themselves or improve their lives. Orientalism Ignores Real Change: Orientalists often ignore the real politic...
Read more

Through Their Eyes: The Male Gaze and the Objectification of Women in Media

Image
There are many ways women are shown in the media, but often in a patriarchal system, women are looked down on by men. In this post, I want to talk about how women are shown in visual media, like TV and movies. As a media student, I will use the "Male Gaze Theory." This idea was introduced by feminist film expert Laura Mulvey. It says that women are shown mostly to please men’s eyes—they are objectified and sexualized, instead of being shown as full and complex people. This type of portrayal supports patriarchal ideas, where men play active and important roles in stories, while women are passive and exist mainly to be watched by men. In other words, women are put there for men’s benefit.h The Male Gaze theory explains how media strengthens gender roles by giving men the power of looking, while women are just there to be looked at. This continues the unfair treatment of women in visual culture. The theory also shows how women in media don’t have control over their own stories a...
Read more